Requested research

Literature review: Collect and assess existing global research on the seismic behavior of confined masonry structures with different masonry materials.

Knowledge integration: Consolidate existing knowledge of confined masonry buildings in seismic zones into one complete, validated, and optimized practical manual.

Reinforcement optimization: Optimize and detail steel reinforcements in tie beams and tie columns over multiple stories, including:

• Comparison of confined masonry with and without steel reinforcements between brick layers.
  
  

• Analysis of wall panels with or without toothing.

Key parameters: Define all factors influencing the seismic performance of this technique, such as wall composition, overall dimensions, reinforcement detailing, material and mechanical properties, and so on.

Practical application: Design, model, and analyze confined masonry model houses and schools in seismic regions. Determine design limitations and structural safety margins, based on minimum needed material and mechanical strengths.

Background: Confined Masonry

Confined masonry has consistently shown strong seismic performance. Since the 1930s, it has been included in building codes across many South and Latin American countries, and its use is expanding in the Middle East and Asia. It is particularly recommended for multi-story buildings with concrete slabs, up to 3–6 floors high.

This system is often cheaper and less complex than making concrete frames earthquake resistant. Confined masonry uses similar amounts of bricks and concrete, but significantly less steel reinforcement. The connections are also straightforward, making them easy to explain to local workers. SSF applied confined masonry in our hostel for blind students in Nepal, which performed well during the 2015 earthquakes.

Extensive research has been performed, including post-earthquake assessments, shake table testing, and structural calculations. Codes and guidelines typically provide methods for calculating wall dimensions, thicknesses, and openings, along with recommended reinforcement details.

However, contradictions remain across published sources. Questions include: Are extra tie beams and columns around openings necessary? Which reinforcement weaving patterns are correct? What is the maximum allowable tooth dimension, and which pattern works best? Are teeth necessary at all?

While confined masonry is already well studied, further fine-tuning is required to resolve these uncertainties. There is still a lot to discover!

Further action

If you’d like to work on this assignment, such as for your final-year thesis, send us an email to receive more information or to schedule a meeting.